Astronomy Report – April 13th

[category 

astronomy-report]

Name: Louis Baltus

Crew: 314

Date: 13Apr2025

MUSK OBSERVATORY

Solar Features Observed: Most of the pictures I took this morning were the whole solar disk. Nevertheless, I zoomed in on regions where I saw prominences in order to train myself with the other scales. Sadly, I only had time to finish my first edit, combining two pictures of the same zoom in a prominences region ( see attached ).

Images submitted with this report: (2) The one I’ve just finished editing and one as an example of the problem I encountered with some of my pictures. More pictures will follow as I have a lot of them to edit in the queue. Please feel free to comment on my first final picture so I can make them even better !

Problems Encountered: In the second attached photo, you’ll see an example of the problem I can have with some of my pictures when I try to stack them on the piece of software. Maybe one of you can give me some advice in order to avoid this problem.

End-mission Research Report – April 18th

[category science-report]

Crew 314 – Closing the Airlock: Lessons Learned from Life on the Red Planet

Over the course of two weeks at the Mars Desert Research Station, our crew carried out a wide range of scientific experiments, technical tasks, and field explorations — all within the framework of a simulated Martian mission. From daily EVAs and lab work to emergency drills and group living, each activity helped us better understand the challenges and possibilities of life on Mars.

Through teamwork, adaptability, and shared curiosity, we made progress across diverse fields including medical science, sleep and stress physiology, microbiology, astronomy and soil science. As we prepare to close the airlock for the last time, we leave with new insights, stronger connections, and a lasting sense of what it might mean to live and work on another world.

Experiments:

This section outlines the progress and the final conclusion of the research projects conducted by the crew during our mission.

Odile Hilgers (Health and Safety Officer):

As Health and Safety Officer for this analog Martian mission, I led a complete series of six medical simulations designed to assess Crisis Resource Management (CRM), known as non-technical skills in an isolated and confined environment. These simulations were inspired by realistic emergency scenarios and adapted to the operational constraints of life on Mars.

The training program was carefully structured to increase in complexity and immersion over time. The first two scenarios served as introductory exercises, focusing on familiarizing the crew with medical protocols and simulation dynamics. The following two represented Earth-based emergencies and required a higher level of coordination and critical thinking. The final two simulations introduced Martian-specific constraints, including operational stressors such as limited visibility, environmental alarms, and nighttime execution under sleep-deprived conditions.

These last two Martian scenarios were conducted under particularly challenging circumstances: one at the very end of the night, and the other at the very beginning, both involving full crew wake-up calls, alarm sounds (moderately loud), and operations without electrical lighting—crew members relied solely on their headlamps. These conditions were designed to simulate the kind of fatigue and sensory overload astronauts may face during long-duration missions.

Each simulation followed a structured three-phase format:

Briefing – Participants received clinical background on the scenario, including the patient’s medical history and the narrative of the current illness.

Simulation – Conducted with three role-players and three observers, adapting to realistic crew roles and responsibilities.

Debriefing – A 30 to 45-minute team discussion centered on Crisis Resource Management (CRM) principles. All participants also completed the Ottawa Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS) to assess team performance in a structured, reflective manner.

Simulations were held in multiple locations within the station, including both levels of the Hab, the Science Dome and the GreenHab. All six scenarios were successfully completed without incident, and the crew demonstrated adaptability, communication, and coordination throughout the program.

Data collection is now complete. A post-mission analysis will be conducted to examine behavioral patterns, decision-making processes, and overall team dynamics under pressure. This evaluation aims to contribute to the broader understanding of medical team performance in analog space missions and inform the design of future training protocols for long-duration spaceflight.

Bérengère Bastogne (GreenHab Officer):

The experiments conducted at the Mars Desert Research Station are part of my doctoral thesis. The main objective is to evaluate the impact of Martian environmental stresses – UV radiation (A, B and C), temperature (hot-cold cycles), gravity and substrate (regolith) – on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). These fungi are obligate symbionts that associate with plant roots and can supply them up to 80% of total phosphorus and nitrogen. As one of the most important mutualistic microorganisms for global food production, AMF are essential elements to be considered for the development of future colonies on Mars.

Understanding how AMF responds to environmental conditions is critical. Since they are closely associated with plants, any parameter affecting spores could impact essential AMF functions and indirectly impact plant growth and plant health. However, despite their crucial role, little is known about how these environmental stresses affect these microorganisms. Therefore, expanding our knowledge in this area is crucial.

My research is divided into two experiments. The first aims to study the effects of these stresses on spore germination. The second focuses on the ability of spores, after exposure to stresses, to associate with plant roots.

The initial step involved estimating the number of spores in 10 g soil (to prepare for the first and second experiments). I then exposed the soil – containing spores – in Petri dishes or Falcon tubes to different conditions for 48h. For the germination study, approximately 10 g of soil (containing 30-40 spores) was used per condition. For the root association study, I used 10 g per condition, with six replicates.

To test the substrate stress, I isolated spores from 6x10g of soil and transferred them into regolith. The environmental conditions were applied as follows:

Temperature: Petri dishes were placed outside (near the entrance of the ScienceDome)

Gravity: Falcon tubes were attached to the Random Positioning Machine (RPM) – placed in the ScienceDome at room temperature

UV: Petri dishes were placed under a UV lamp in the ScienceDome at room temperature

Substrate: Spores were placed in Petri dishes filled with regolith, kept in the ScienceDome at room temperature

Control: Petri dishes were placed in the ScienceDome at room temperature without any added stress

After 48h, for the germination study, I isolated spores from the soil samples exposed to the different conditions. Then, to prevent contamination in subsequent steps, I disinfected the spores using various solutions. Once disinfected, I placed four spores on each membrane, which was then folded in half twice. The membranes were then buried in a moistened soil mix within Petri dishes and incubated in the ScienceDome at room temperature.

For the second experiment, I mixed the stressed soils (post-48h exposure) with a soil mix in small pots. After moistening, I transplanted ten plantain seedlings (germinated in the greenhouse approximately one week earlier) into each pot. All pots were labeled and placed in the ScienceDome at room temperature.

On Wednesday 16 April, I assessed spore germination and viability by transferring each membrane to a separate Petri dish and adding a drop of methyl thiazolyl diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) to each spore. Since MTT is photosensitive, I covered the Petri dishes with aluminium foil and kept them in the ScienceDome at room temperature. After 24h (Thursday 17 April), I observed the germination and viability of each spore under microscope.

On Thursday and Friday, 17 and 18 April, I evaluated the association between AMF spores and plant roots. All plantain seedlings were harvested and stained using a series of treatments (bleach, vinegar, and ink) at 70°C (oven). After staining, I observed each seeding root under a microscope to determine whether there was any point of contact between the AMF and the roots.

During the EVAs, I collected soil samples to identify the AMF species present in the Utah desert soil, depending on their characteristics. I observed the presence of mycelium and spores in some soils.

I placed the soil samples in Petri dishes and inoculated them with spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The dishes were kept at room temperature for 48h. After this, I collected the spores, transferred them onto a membrane and added a drop of MTT solution. After 24h, I examined each spore under a microscope to assess its viability.

In addition, I subjected soil samples collected during the EVAs to different stress conditions (temperature, UV, gravity and control). Once back in Belgium, I will analyze the viability of the spores from these soils following the stress treatments.

Batoul Tani (Crew Journalist):

As part of the microbiological experiments conducted during the MDRS (Mars Desert Research Station) mission, I investigated the resistance of two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Bacillus thuringiensis, to various environmental stressors simulating Martian surface conditions. These stressors included UV-C radiation, temperature fluctuations, and the potential protective effect of native soil samples.

During the initial phase of the mission, I focused on preparing culture media, including LB broth and agar plates in Petri dishes, to ensure sterile and consistent growth conditions for the duration of the experiments.

For Escherichia coli, I conducted two main exposure experiments. The first involved an 8-hour exposure to UV-C light to assess the bacterium’s tolerance to high doses of ultraviolet radiation. The second experiment consisted of a 48-hour outdoor exposure, subjecting the cultures to natural day-night cycles and ambient temperature variations—conditions designed to mimic thermal changes on the Martian surface. In the coming days, I plan to monitor the potential development of biofilm structures under these stress conditions, as biofilm formation can serve as a protective survival mechanism in extreme environments. Optical density measurements will be carried out in Belgium to quantify the differences between the experimental groups.

For Bacillus thuringiensis, I applied a similar 8-hour UV-C exposure protocol, introducing an additional variable: the presence or absence of soil collected from the Cowboy Corner site. This allowed for the exploration of a potential shielding effect provided by the local soil against UV radiation. The samples were also exposed to either stable or cyclic temperature conditions to investigate the interaction between thermal stress, UV exposure, and soil protection.

I analyzed the differences in colony-forming unit (CFU) counts across the various conditions, and some significant trends have begun to emerge. However, I would have liked to examine whether the bacteria underwent sporulation, as this is a key survival strategy for Bacillus thuringiensis. Unfortunately, the microscope available on site was not of sufficient quality to allow for such observations.

These experiments aim to contribute to our understanding of microbial resilience in Martian analog environments, with implications for planetary protection protocols and the development of microbial-based life support systems for future space missions.

Louis Baltus (Crew Astronomer):

The first experiment I conducted during the MDRS simulation aimed at developing a solar weather monitoring system through the use of the Musk Observatory. The objective was to establish a protocol for solar imaging and data collection that could eventually support forecasting tools to protect future astronauts from solar radiation exposure on Mars.

The early stages of the mission were hindered by a delay in my personal training on the telescope’s operations. As a result, I lost valuable observation days during the first part of the rotation. Despite this initial setback, I successfully conducted my first imaging session mid-mission, and continued making observations whenever weather conditions permitted.

Unfortunately, after Sol 6, the weather became increasingly uncooperative. Strong winds and dense cloud cover significantly reduced available observation windows. I nonetheless maintained efforts to operate the telescope during every favorable interval. By the end of the simulation, I had accumulated a modest but valuable collection of solar images.

Once I return to Belgium, I will carry out a detailed post-processing and analysis phase. The goal will be to assess whether the quantity and quality of the captured data are sufficient to move forward with the development of a basic solar weather monitoring prototype.

Regardless of the limited observation time, this experience has been extremely rewarding on a personal and scientific level. Learning to operate a solar observatory and observing the Sun with my own eyes has been a profound and unforgettable discovery. I remain deeply grateful to all those who made this opportunity possible.

The second experiment, supervised by a professor from UCLouvain, investigated gesture-based astronaut-computer interaction (ACI) — a field with very limited prior research. The aim was to evaluate the cognitive and physical feasibility of using wearable gesture-recognition devices in analog Martian conditions. The two systems tested were the TapStrap and the TapXR.

The experimental protocol was composed of four distinct measurement sessions:

A baseline session, conducted pre-mission under standard terrestrial conditions.

A first in-mission session on Sol 4, performed with the participant in regular indoor clothing.

A second in-mission session on Sol 8, carried out under extravehicular activity (EVA) conditions, with the participant wearing a full one-piece astronaut suit.

A final post-mission session, scheduled to take place in Belgium, which will complete the full dataset.

The Sol 8 session provided particularly valuable data, as it tested gesture input performance under conditions of reduced dexterity and tactile feedback. Despite the additional constraints imposed by the EVA suit, the session was executed smoothly, and all required data was successfully collected.

As the experimenter, I oversaw each session, guided the participant through the sequence of 16 predefined gestures, and systematically recorded performance metrics including memorization accuracy, recognition rate, and execution time. This structured approach will allow for a comprehensive comparison across different environmental and ergonomic conditions.

Upon completion of the final post-mission session, I will work in collaboration with my supervising professor to conduct a full analysis of the results. The aim is to draw conclusions regarding the viability and limitations of gesture-based interfaces in space mission scenarios.

This research offers promising perspectives for the development of alternative control systems for future planetary missions—especially in environments where traditional input methods are limited or impractical.

Antoine Dubois (Crew Engineer):

As part of my mission at the Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS), I conducted an experiment aimed at better understanding wind-driven erosion dynamics in an arid environment analogous to Mars. The goal was to assess erosion caused by wind and draw lessons to help protect infrastructure under extreme Martian conditions, where the thin atmosphere and harsh climate suggest a slow but persistent erosion process.

In the field, I installed three dust collectors at different heights (10 cm, 20 cm, and 30 cm) to observe variations in particle size distribution depending on transport height. This aimed to determine whether specific grain sizes are more likely to be transported at certain altitudes, which could inform the design and durability of Martian structures.

I also deployed a data logger connected to three sensors placed under each collector to measure soil moisture, temperature, and electrical conductivity, helping to understand how soil conditions influence sediment mobility.

Initially, all devices worked correctly, and the first samples were collected shortly after mid-mission. However, due to poor weather and difficult terrain access, the equipment was retrieved on SOL 11 instead of SOL 12 as planned.

A technical issue occurred: although the sensors operated correctly, a configuration error in the data logger prevented environmental data from being recorded, limiting direct analysis of on-site measurements.

Despite this, I retrieved complementary environmental data from the station’s iMac, including wind speed and direction, ambient humidity, and rainfall events — all valuable for interpreting the experiment’s results.

The collected dust samples were sieved using three mesh sizes (2 mm, 500 µm, and 250 µm) and weighed on site. Detailed particle size analyses will be performed after returning to Earth (Belgium) to produce precise granulometric profiles.

Despite the challenges, the experiment yielded usable samples and coherent environmental data for interpretation. This contributes to a better understanding of aeolian transport in deserts and may support the design of infrastructure suited to Martian conditions.

Béatrice Hollander and Arnaud de Wergifosse (Crew Commander and Crew Executive Officer):

As part of an investigation into human resilience in isolated and confined environments, this study evaluated the effects of a dietary supplement combining Lactobacillus helveticus and glycine, compared to a placebo, on stress regulation and sleep during a two-week analog mission at the Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS). Crew members were monitored nightly using wearable devices (Oura rings®) that tracked physiological indicators such as heart rate, heart rate variability, total sleep time, and sleep stages. Self-reported stress, sleep satisfaction, and daytime sleepiness were also assessed through validated questionnaires.

All participants practiced daily cardiac coherence breathing, a controlled technique designed to promote autonomic regulation. While no significant differences were found between the supplement and placebo groups, some participants reported consistently positive effects from cardiac coherence, including reduced stress and improved emotional regulation.

Interestingly, sleep became more fragmented during the second week, coinciding with nighttime emergency simulations. Despite these disturbances, perceived stress levels paradoxically declined, possibly reflecting psychological adaptation to the mission environment or due to the breathing technique. Furthermore, some participants also exhibited clinically relevant daytime sleepiness.

Although the supplementation showed no clear effect over the short term, the breathing practice proved to be a well-received and low-effort countermeasure. Full statistical analyses will follow to better interpret the collected data and clarify emerging trends.

Crew 309 End-Mission Research Report 22Mar2025

[title End-Mission Research Report – March 22nd]

[category science-report]

Crew 309 Mission Science Report
MDRS, Saturday 22 March 2025

Name of person filing report: Aaron Allred
Overview: Crew 309 has been in the MDRS for one week, conducting a pilot
experiment within the research domain of aerospace human factors research. Due to
the nature of these experiments, the six-person habitat crew has remained naïve to
the experiment objectives, which have been coordinated by a separate three-person
experimental team stationed in nearby Hanksville, UT while running remote
operations by day out of the science dome.
In particular, our primary experiment examined how aspects of teams, confined to an
isolated space analog, influence information processing, communication, and
performance amongst dyads performing simulated EVAs. As such, our experiment
required different combinations of the six-person habitat crew to perform a series of
12 EVAs over the course of the week. During these EVAs, the crew was in full sim.
Due to the ongoing nature of this experiment (and being a pilot test), some of the
finer experimental details are left intentionally vague. Please feel free to contact us.
Name: Extravehicular Activity Navigation Tasks
Type: Human Factors: Judgments and Decision-Making
Crew: Full Crew
Description: The crew performed a series of 12 EVAs over the course of a week
(each lasting ~3 hours) in various dyad pairs. These pairs were structured by the
experimenters a priori to produce unique combinations across team members, who
were each assigned unique roles including Co-Commander A, Co-Commander B,
Scientist, Engineer, Medic, and GreenHab. These roles provided an assigned
hierarchy that was assessed for natural evolution throughout the mission week using
subjectively reported nightly surveys, as well as after EVAs.
During these EVAs, which represent unique experimental trials, crewmembers were
assigned unique pieces of information that could not be shared physically but could
be shared using other forms of communication (such as over radio). This portion of
the design used distributed information sources to simulate distributed expertise that
may be encountered during future space missions EVAs.
Navigation performance was gathered using Garmin T5X GPS tracking equipment in
real-time. Experimenters had access to a Garmin Alpha 10 handheld and Drivetrack
71, which enabled this real-time tracking and monitoring. In addition to voice and
position sensors, pilot participants were outfitted with physiological sensors, which
included eye-tracking glasses. For this pilot experiment the Tobii 2 was utilized, but in
future experiments, the Tobii 3 is planned. Following EVAs and at night,
crewmembers filled a number of surveys. To facilitate these devices, custom
spacesuit simulators were designed and engineered for this mission.

A vehicle in a desert AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 1 . Return from a dyadic navigation task on the final day.

Status:
All experimental conditions were successfully piloted by the crew over the course of
the course of the simulation. In addition to executing these tasks in dyads,
crewmembers also successfully made autonomous repairs to their custom spacesuit
simulators, eye-tracking equipment, and survey software. This pilot experiment
demonstrated that a trained crew is capable of performing autonomous, in-simulation
human factors research at MDRS for full data collection at a later date. Further, this
pilot experiment gave key insights into how to titrate the task difficulty at each of our 6
EVA sites, streamline experimental operations, and provide a more representative
spaceflight-analog isolation and confinement experience to crew members.

Astronomy Report – February 17th

[category 

astronomy-report]

Astronomy Report
Name: Quentin Berlemont
Crew: 311
Date: 02/17/2025

MDRS ROBOTIC OBSERVATORY
Robotic Telescope Used (choose one) MDRS-14 MDRS-WF RCOS-16
Objects to be Imaged this Evening:
Images submitted with this report:
Problems Encountered:
MUSK OBSERVATORY
Solar Features Observed: few sunspots + protuberances
Images submitted with this report: 2
Problems Encountered: I followed all the steps for sun imaging, it
renders great until I select "Stack" on sharpcap, which makes a double
of the original image and place it on top, as you can see on the first
image linked. It is not related to a long exposure time as I only took
1000 images for about 3 seconds. Could you help me with this issue? Also
I see absolutely no difference both in the eyepiece and the camera when
turning either tuners, maybe they are too far engaged? What should I do?

Astronomy Report – February 18th

[category 

astronomy-report]

Crew 311 Astronomy Report 18Feb2025
Name: Quentin Berlemont
Crew: 311
Date: 02/18/2025
MDRS ROBOTIC OBSERVATORY
Robotic Telescope Used (choose one) MDRS-14 MDRS-WF RCOS-16
Objects to be Imaged this Evening:
Images submitted with this report:
Problems Encountered:
MUSK OBSERVATORY
Solar Features Observed: few sunspots
Images submitted with this report: 2
Problems Encountered: I did as you told for the tuners, it seems to
work! On my previous report I confused the program names, I meant "stack
on registax". It seems that the issue was due to the telescope moving
somehow because today the pictures are clear! Do you have advices on how
to set the tuners to make the best images of the chromosphere or
prominences?

Research Report – March 14th

[category science-report]

Crew 311 Mission Science Report
MDRS, Friday 13 March 2025
Name of person filing report: Somaya Bennani – bennani.somaya311
Crew 311 has been in the MDRS for four weeks now, conducting experiments while simulating life on Mars. We have done everything we could to make this simulation as accurate and relevant as possible. The current report aims to give the reader an understanding of what has been achieved and what is yet to come.
This report is organized as follows: overview of all the experiments conducted during our mission, as found in the Mission Plan sent on Sol 1, reminded here for clarity, and updated with the experiments’ current status.
Name: LOAC / MegaAres / Field mill / Cosmic watch / Weather station
Type: Atmospheric physics
Crew: Robin (Crew Engineer) & Quentin (Crew Astronomer)
Description:
LOAC / MegaAres: These experiments, conducted since 2019, originates from the French National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS). It involves EVA operations and includes two key instruments: LOAC, an optical aerosol counter that measures and classifies airborne particles by size, and Mega-Ares, a sensor that precisely measures the electric field and air conductivity.
Field mill / Cosmic watch / Weather station: The experiment involves several measurement instruments to analyze environmental and space weather conditions. The field mill is used to measure the local electric field, providing insights into atmospheric electrical activity. The cosmic watch consists of two particle detectors that quantify the number of cosmic particles reaching the Earth’s surface. The collected data is analyzed in correlation with solar eruptions and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) to study their impact on Earth’s environment. Additionally, a weather station records precise atmospheric parameters at the observation site, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of local weather conditions.
Status:
All instruments have been deployed 400m away from the station on sol 3. The batteries have been charged and changed every two to three days and the data collected after each swap.
A significant amount of data was collected, but the Mega-Ares interface proved to be overly complex and did not match the outdated manual provided. The LOAC was returned to the base on SOL 18. A bug in the Mega-Ares interface prevented data collection. However, the other four experiments proceeded without any issues.

AD_4nXejwBmYECPanhs4563jKRa5OUqY6SudRMH3nZMa2nlJdZmFBoJ1m-A-HzCfOxtcXOlxzRV7IRmttk-lu_-dxL2kkzXwxCCjMY6qFVxzrd9E4y6hywxtsfk34CKc5m62E_iKfE41NdLOVwTDNRWua-Q?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb
Name: AMAIA
Type: Technology
Crew: Isolde (Crew Journalist)
Description: The AMAIA system is integrated with station sensors, including environmental sensors and monitoring devices, enabling seamless data exchange. This integration allows AMAIA to estimate stress levels and provide data-driven responses to astronaut queries. Its capabilities support astronauts in their daily tasks by assisting with environmental measurements, voice recognition, and emergency exercises, enhancing both efficiency and safety in the station.
Status:
The computer LLM part of this experiment is working perfectly, we are currently using the AI assistant to translate report to English and also to have some recipes for our lyophilised food.
We tested the PIE code of ISAE Supaero, and while it functioned, it was not perfect. Various bugs appeared throughout the test, but due to communication delays, they couldn’t be resolved. The Amaia watches were not used by the crew because of these persistent issues.

AD_4nXdmnHiKN4Wzi9APExuL2p6-twVQgsDzEMv6WsMnV7WWhMJ65xGvXTigPdHjzRvNgTx4loYXJCWUM9C5bxRWLiRk2fXZNteYYG1KzoM9yNlmvCDPCui72PT15KBxvEUiVxUqFxtAjkelHKZ62bmR-Xk?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb
Name: Orbital Architecture
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist) & Celyan (HSO)
Description: The study aims to quantify stress levels in analog astronauts using chestbands, smartwatches, questionnaires, and position sensors. It investigates the impact of environmental factors such as privacy, temperature, and humidity on stress levels. As part of the Axiom 3 mission, this research has also been launched to the International Space Station for further analysis in a space environment. The cognitive tests are taken in different areas of the base (Science dome, Greenhab, Hab) every time with a frequency of twice per week for every crew member.
Status: The IPS (Internal Position System) have been deployed during the first 4 sols of the mission. Since this day we are collecting daily data from the IPS as well as from the polar band and the polar watch. In addition, we have installed the BIOS light bulbs in both the upper deck and the lower deck during the first week. Everything is going well. The data has been sent to the PIs in KTH frequently.
A light fixture on a ceiling AI-generated content may be incorrect.
Name: Humanise
Type: Robotics
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist)
Description: This research investigates human-machine interaction, stress, and performance by examining cognitive workload during teleoperation between analog astronauts and rovers. The study aims to improve human-robot collaboration for future Martian settlements. Various control methods are tested, including Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) using mental imagery, Virtual Reality (VR), and joystick control. The goal is to develop intuitive and user-friendly remote-control interfaces for operating rovers in Mars- or Moon-like environments.
Status: The first part of this experiment with gamepad is done. All astronauts have monitored the robot using a PS5 controller in the science dome to teleoperate a robot very far away in the campus of TU Delft, in the Netherlands.
The second phase involved testing the teleoperation of the rover using a VR headset. Unfortunately, due to issues with the rover, we could only conduct a general benchmarking for VR system assessment and gather user feedback.

AD_4nXdJEOUIMSeudzXNfeWi8ThTHNk5NulliHQcelWO2ZPbm6ArHIjXBIWiBNuDspg5E-WFYcHSyE6hWpRyBo3EPT9dH5ynehzi8uZfXKpKtDCR77DupRB-UprGzzeHCHf6oaaDAFtxXRAuN4sV94Je-Q?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb

Name: Time Percept
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Celyan (HSO)
Description: This experiment investigates the impact of living and working conditions in an analogue base on time perception. It includes daily cognitive tests to assess effects on analogue astronauts.
Status: Data is collected twice a day (morning and evening) thanks to an app installed in our computers. Everything is going well. Data will be sent to the PI after the end of the mission.

Name: Photogrammetry
Type: Human Factors & Exploration
Crew: Meddi (GreenHab officer) & Robin (Crew Engineer)
Description: Building on measurements from last year, this study involves nine EVAs coordinated with atmospheric physics EVAs. It focuses on testing 3D terrain maps for EVA preparation and exploration, assessing their benefits for checkpoint identification and location during extravehicular activities. The research also compares scenarios with and without prior familiarization with 3D maps to evaluate their impact on navigation and mission efficiency.
Status: The first phase of the experiment was conducted during the second week of our stay at the MDRS. Using our drone, we successfully mapped a small section of Candor Chasma. The crew then explored the canyon utilizing both 3D and 2D maps to compare performance differences.
In the third week, two teams of two analogue astronauts explored the Sea of Shells area. During the fourth week, two different teams of two analogue astronauts carried out the experiment in the Kissing Camel Ridge area, searching for various tags.
AD_4nXc3CO4SycDBiYeB3x1uHq9q9Rx0RW391fzjsrHNFB0ijaRMvAUtk2WVpshkKo1hIDKBtHVMYLSPp2GIv34czU-re0vvreyaGwQ6smqMgAriXq6DKV0u9tSEJuys1sv4749xw1y8Yz-0F0tVGo2fXUk?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb
Name: Neopouss
Type: Botany
Crew: Meddi (GreenHab officer)
Description: This study aims to assess the impact of microgreens on meal taste and enjoyment. A blind taste test is conducted to compare microgreens grown in soil, glucose tablets, and agar-agar. Additionally, the research evaluates how the presence of a greenhouse in a Martian base influences crew well-being, providing insights into the psychological and nutritional benefits of fresh food in isolated environments.
Status: The microgreens were planted early in the mission (Sol 3), they went through a 5-day phase of germination in the dark and in a humidified environment. We put them under the light during Sol 9 in the GreenHab and in the Science Dome. Everything went according to plan except for the absence of fresh soil in the GreenHab and the fact that the environment is very dry here in the Utah Desert.
The crew incorporated microgreens into their lyophilized meals, enhancing freshness and flavor. They also participated in blind taste tests and completed questionnaires to evaluate how the addition of microgreens improved their relationship with food.
AD_4nXc4G_Va4R-csBebKFpKgsLgA3DtNLVxlPSMgpku86IbmgaMloFfvVM7zkCxp9XUXNJJkk3lmoygV-bvNBrlTDcia3vD7yRa8lwCi4obE0zFppYQeDl-N6Iug-PuEZNUZZHFb7gbpLg-zJBl-ScQH8o?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb
Name: TraceLab
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Erin (Crew commander)
Description: This study uses self-administered questionnaires to explore individual and social adaptations to isolated and confined extreme environments. The goal is to examine the social, emotional, occupational, and physical impacts of these conditions, providing insights into human resilience and well-being in space-like settings.
Status: The crew is filling daily questionnaire about individual and social adaptations. As well, weekly questionnaires about team dynamics are filled out. The data will be sent to the PI at the end of the mission.
Name: Core Data
Type: Physiology
Crew: Robin (Crew Engineer)
Description: The Supaero MDRS Crews Initiative aims to collect physiological datasets for human factors research. In addition to physiological data, the study includes water monitoring and environmental measurements. The purpose is to ensure comprehensive data collection while minimizing redundancy, enhancing the reliability and applicability of the research.
Status: The crew is taking daily physiological data (Oximetry, Systolic and diastolic blood, temperature) as well as other parameters using the Withings smart scale. The crew also fills daily sleep dairy every morning before the sport session. Everyone is wearing a Withings smartwatch to collect data all along the day.

Significant improvements were made in documentation and data analysis of various physiological and environmental parameters.
AD_4nXes7bLrKRaecAgSUZA7Aia2LhKBO6Y0zmaBdM7gdzffyJ4IRgkUdjunuCNw_xMJJ4ZNe23do5Ycifvm-D9FWasRpV1aUOC5juVitEgT-yoPPdyKHSeR1CVp4FDA_QrIxWPyeLwamv2DSNL_c9GJNCQ?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb
Name: MoovToLearn
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist)
Description: This study examines the impact of luminotherapy and relaxation technology on analog astronauts, focusing on factors such as sleep quality. It utilizes PSIO glasses to explore their effects while relying solely on Core Data, without conducting cognitive assessments.
Status: The crew tested the PSIO glasses and documented their experiences in a logbook, detailing each session and its effects. However, the overall experience was not particularly enjoyable, as the lights were too harsh on the eyes and the music occasionally felt awkward. Feedback will be provided to the PI after the mission.
Name: TwinS2
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Isolde (Crew Journalist)
Description: The objective of this study is to test and improve the TwinS2 system by evaluating human performance through non-invasive methods. Voice messages recorded via a microphone provide data for researchers, allowing them to assess and refine their software.
Status: The crew records daily logs to share their thoughts and experiences from the day, along with a weekly four-hour recording every Thursday. Additionally, a third measurement was introduced, where a specific text is read once before the mission, once midway, and once at the end.
Name: AMI
Type: Technology
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist) & Isolde (Crew Journalist)
Description: This study conducts an in-situ test of an anomaly surveillance interface to enhance the simulation. It analyzes crew reactions to unplanned or randomized events that require minor interventions. In some cases, the study may involve up to two "emergency" EVAs near the station. The use of the Engineering Airlock has been requested to support the experiment.
Status: Due to issues on the PI’s end, the software could not be delivered in time for our mission. Unfortunately, we were unable to test it this year.
Name: Stratigraphy
Type: Geology
Crew: Quentin (Crew Astronomer) & Meddi (GreenHab Officer)
Description: This experiment, conducted by the Research Institute of Astrophysics and Planetology (IRAP), involves EVAs coordinated with photogrammetry EVAs. It focuses on testing stratigraphy through drone imagery, aiming to identify geological samples using these pictures. The study also seeks to train the drone to capture images of entire stratigraphic layers for improved geological analysis.
Status: During the two EVAs conducted last week, crew members documented various rock strata in different areas around the base. They captured aerial images using drones and a professional camera and created detailed geological sketches. Discussions with the PIs were held to study the images and analyse key geological points of interest.

AD_4nXcn5z8e2mHe2nd7YEUd8e-OQTvhqWT0OWV9XD1_wlHzjM6HDw1PLoZY77BauzaCMOAInKwybOuW_524J9qcX0IDFl3tliBrr4a8dWObwEMzFA3BT_q1YK64pPdpVlTe8LSWgTN7Hx76VVgu68ioyQ?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb
Name: SupaeroMoon
Type: Robotics
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist) & Robin (Crew Engineer)
Description: This project focuses on rovers and technologies designed for the lunar environment, with participation in the European Rover Challenge 2025. It involves testing remote control navigation, evaluating camera and mapping methodologies, and exploring the feasibility of simple autonomous navigation. Additionally, the study tests a robotic arm for probe retrieval and collaborates with high school students on Arduino-based experiments.
Status: The entire rover was successfully 3D-printed, with all electronics assembled and tested according to the provided procedures. During EVA #15, we captured various images of the rover to support the SupaeroMoon team’s application for the European Rover Challenge.

AD_4nXc7RC0gg7BDZnXV3gCjOAot-3hygFk6G_qUL1tDVFXM78tDXkuQYYGvnZ_QLEeDUeBTkmc2v7CcV4ADXbo4vRrwUPGBvOglP8pib9ZZppMkoB-0sAajjpRlUi4nEFizesVZrH56erzCcfIcWNgC9A?key=1us_5fnpxgJVgwomFFgWMplb
Name: Public Outreach
Type: Social
Crew: Meddi (GreenHab Officer)
Description: This project aims to teach the scientific method through a hands-on experiment. It involves sprouting cress seeds in highly saline soil to simulate Martian conditions and assess plant growth viability. The experiment requires one EVA for execution.
Status: Weekly microgreens reports are sent to high school students eager to engage with our MDRS mission. In weeks 3 and 4, they will explore the importance of EVA preparation. The HSO shared space exercise videos, students helped prepare the photogrammetry EVA, and different responses were recorded in various base locations.
Name: Astronomer’s observation project
Type: Astronomy
Crew: Quentin (Crew astronomer)
Description: Quentin’s observation project consists of two distinct works: during the first two weeks of the mission, he familiarized himself with the telescope of the Musk Observatory by doing several pictures and animations of the Sun with different parameters. By doing so, he managed to capture high-quality pictures and videos of sunspots and prominences and learned to process them using various softwares.
Status: During the second half of the mission, Quentin conducted his astronomy project. He took dozens of pictures of the sun for several days; the telescope parameters were set for observing sunspots with a high contrast.
The project consists of using a code which Quentin developed to detect the sunspots in the images and track their movements. This tool will be used and improved by the future Supaero crews.

Une image contenant cercle, capture d’écran, diagramme, texte Le contenu généré par l’IA peut être incorrect.

Supplemental Operations Report – 08Mar2025

[title Supplemental Operations Report -March 8th]
[category operations-report]

Date: 3/8/2025
Name of person filing report: David Steinhour
Reason for Report: Routine
Non-Nominal Systems:
Non-Nominal Systems: Crew car. Power system battery, invertors, generator. Robotic observatory. HAB outer shell.

Power system: "Solar: The battery bank does not hold charge when the sun is down and low on the horizon. Inverter Slave 1 and 2 went offline and did not restart, which limits us to 5kW when on solar.
Main generator has been monitored for oil leaks; minor leaks observed, need to add oil every 2-3 days. Generator is limited to 8kW, see previous reports for details.
Main generator:
1) Oil, oil filter changed on 2/26/2025.
2) Current hours – 8772.8"

Propane Readings: "Refilled 2/26/2025
Station Tank: 62%
Director Tank: 58%
Intern Tank: 79%
Generator Tank: 53%"

Water: "Hab Static Tank – 241.4 gallons
GreenHab – 121.5 gallons
Outpost tank – 390 gallons"

Rovers: "Sojourner rover used: No
Hours: 209.5
Beginning Charge: 100 %
Ending Charge: 100 %
Currently Charging: Yes
Notes on Rovers: None"

Cars: "Hab Car used and why, where: To Hanksville for supplies.
Crew Car used and why, where: No.
General notes and comments: Crew car driver’s side front ball joint is bad. Low oil pressure is most likely caused by a bad sensor (it does not change due to RPM or temperature like it should)."

Summary of Internet: Nominal
EVA suits and radios: "Suits: Nominal.
Comms: Nominal.
T-Echo EVA-link: Astro8 is malfunctioning and needs to be replaced."
Campus wide inspection, if action taken, what and why: Tunnel tarp was patched today 3/8 by crew on a mock-emergency EVA. Repair looks good.
Summary of Hab Operations: Small cracks in the wall of the Hab in the loft area are allowing cold air intrusion.
Summary of GreenHab Operations: Nominal
Summary of SciDome Operations: Nominal
Summary of Observatories Operations: Nominal
Summary of RAM Operations: Nominal
Summary of Outpost Operations: Nominal
Summary of Health and Safety Issues: Nominal

Astronomy Report – March 10th

[category  astronomy-report]

Name: Quentin Berlemont

Crew: 311

Date: 03/10/2025

MDRS ROBOTIC OBSERVATORY

Robotic Telescope Used (choose one) MDRS-14 MDRS-WF RCOS-16

Objects to be Imaged this Evening:

Images submitted with this report:

Problems Encountered:

MUSK OBSERVATORY

Solar Features Observed: Sunspots, prominences

Images submitted with this report: 1

Problems Encountered: Good evening Peter, I am purposely taking less
detailed pictures than the previous weeks because for my project I need
contrast only on the sunspots zones. Here is an example. I was wondering
if there was a way to know which is the real orientation of the sun, and
which way it is turning while making an observation. During the span of
a day, as the telescope moves, the sun’s orientation as seen by the camera evolves, and I would like to make it stay the same.

Mid-Mission Research Report – March 2nd

[category science-report]

Crew 311 Mid-mission Science Report
MDRS, Sunday 03 March 2025
Name of person filing report: Somaya Bennani – bennani.somaya311
Crew 311 has been in the MDRS for two weeks now, conducting experiments while simulating life on Mars. We have done everything we could to make this simulation as accurate and relevant as possible. The current report aims to give the reader an understanding of what has been achieved and what is yet to come.
This report is organized as follows: overview of all the experiments conducted during our mission, as found in the Mission Plan sent on Sol 1, reminded here for clarity, and updated with the experiments’ current status.
Name: LOAC / MegaAres / Field mill / Cosmic watch / Weather station
Type: Atmospheric physics
Crew: Robin (Crew Engineer) & Quentin (Crew Astronomer)
Description:
LOAC / MegaAres: These experiments, conducted since 2019, originates from the French National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS). It involves EVA operations and includes two key instruments: LOAC, an optical aerosol counter that measures and classifies airborne particles by size, and Mega-Ares, a sensor that precisely measures the electric field and air conductivity.
Field mill / Cosmic watch / Weather station: The experiment involves several measurement instruments to analyze environmental and space weather conditions. The field mill is used to measure the local electric field, providing insights into atmospheric electrical activity. The cosmic watch consists of two particle detectors that quantify the number of cosmic particles reaching the Earth’s surface. The collected data is analyzed in correlation with solar eruptions and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) to study their impact on Earth’s environment. Additionally, a weather station records precise atmospheric parameters at the observation site, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of local weather conditions.
Related EVAs: #3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Status:
All instruments have been deployed 400m away from the station on sol 3. The batteries have been charged and changed every two to three days and the data collected after each swap. All instruments are healthy and collecting good data.

AD_4nXc3zvpddAJIlyOsRbEn9Z0wktJOsOOh7Ug2BndYJI5X9JSmASKpCFNC8gUiTfsFLecEBxyhzbvBvUMrQP3n_d73dTqSfT-1HkuzNc8g1xwfadeMZWr-4IAzGs9hC7D7qdWTMSiblg8X-hUAatju4d8?key=jIlEDhEuFQcPRd_cjtrODUUC

Name: AMAIA
Type: Technology
Crew: Isolde (Crew Journalist)
Description: The AMAIA system is integrated with station sensors, including environmental sensors and monitoring devices, enabling seamless data exchange. This integration allows AMAIA to estimate stress levels and provide data-driven responses to astronaut queries. Its capabilities support astronauts in their daily tasks by assisting with environmental measurements, voice recognition, and emergency exercises, enhancing both efficiency and safety in the station.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: The computer LLM part of this experiment is working perfectly, we are currently using the AI assistant to translate report to English and also to have some recipes for our lyophilised food. The watch part doesn’t work properly, so we are still in discussion with the researchers at CNES and we try our best to debug it in order to find the problem.

AD_4nXfXVXDUDYikoTfAlnZP1cd8NgwNDnUkTRvIcYJuVpDyGKLgy5wdL9sFGcu_Fy_Y08Itz092wvgk4DIh8cFdx4v05WZlfNSWw4nl2AkLm5zHQS34F4hn257BuJvcYs4xFdEs11CBPBeXX3yBhR5dROA?key=jIlEDhEuFQcPRd_cjtrODUUC

Name: Orbital Architecture
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist) & Celyan (HSO)
Description: The study aims to quantify stress levels in analog astronauts using chestbands, smartwatches, questionnaires, and position sensors. It investigates the impact of environmental factors such as privacy, temperature, and humidity on stress levels. As part of the Axiom 3 mission, this research has also been launched to the International Space Station for further analysis in a space environment. The cognitive tests are taken in different areas of the base (Science dome, Greenhab, Hab) every time with a frequency of twice per week for every crew member.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: The IPS (Internal Position System) have been deployed during the first 4 sols of the mission. Since this day we are collecting daily data from the IPS as well as from the polar band and the polar watch. In addition, we have installed the BIOS light bulbs in both the upper deck and the lower deck during the first week. Everything is going well.

A light fixture on a ceiling AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Name: Humanise
Type: Robotics
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist)
Description: This research investigates human-machine interaction, stress, and performance by examining cognitive workload during teleoperation between analog astronauts and rovers. The study aims to improve human-robot collaboration for future Martian settlements. Various control methods are tested, including Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) using mental imagery, Virtual Reality (VR), and joystick control. The goal is to develop intuitive and user-friendly remote-control interfaces for operating rovers in Mars- or Moon-like environments.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: The first part of this experiment with gamepad is done. All astronauts have monitored the robot using a PS5 controller in the science dome to teleoperate a robot very fat away in the campus of TU Delft, in the Netherlands. The second part will be to do the same experiment but with a VR headset to control the rover.

AD_4nXeg_o4qxfDt0nFB4a0mx8_tK2-3nIpGHN3CTpB5buh7uUYGwcdExB4CHlsCg2Jt3UUDeYp4ZOsu6sOftrPeBNCaNK9Sa_5tNrUdCGbOmVqJGrrYOsXoocMTkq2MccePSYIZan2S1lz6OHSaWdO51w?key=jIlEDhEuFQcPRd_cjtrODUUC

Name: Time Percept
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Celyan (HSO)
Description: This experiment investigates the impact of living and working conditions in an analogue base on time perception. It includes daily cognitive tests to assess effects on analogue astronauts
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: Data is collected twice a day (morning and evening) thanks to an app installed in our computers. Everything is going well.

Name: Photogrammetry
Type: Human Factors & Exploration
Crew: Meddi (GreenHab officer) & Robin (Crew Engineer)
Description: Building on measurements from last year, this study involves nine EVAs coordinated with atmospheric physics EVAs. It focuses on testing 3D terrain maps for EVA preparation and exploration, assessing their benefits for checkpoint identification and location during extravehicular activities. The research also compares scenarios with and without prior familiarization with 3D maps to evaluate their impact on navigation and mission efficiency.
Related EVAs: #5, 6, 7
Status: The first sequence of the experiment took place during week 2 of our stay at the MDRS. We successfully mapped a small part of Candor Chasma using our drone. The crew then explored the canyon using 3D and 2D Maps to monitor the differences in performances. Next week we will discover another area of the martian desert.

AD_4nXfsFBlc--3LCq1oF69OLtzxRH0PP7HUX3JukSQ2NoaFRMuv30rPcgoGODjQMlZC5aExGAM_wjrbvNjiXSLKiiUrCpIhUAX-rxHt9Q1J8us6i_Y5UcNQY-5Dz9Rkf3wugmDSeB_2ePotsM1cycCmwUs?key=jIlEDhEuFQcPRd_cjtrODUUC

Name: Neopouss
Type: Botany
Crew: Meddi (GreenHab officer)
Description: This study aims to assess the impact of microgreens on meal taste and enjoyment. A blind taste test is conducted to compare microgreens grown in soil, glucose tablets, and agar-agar. Additionally, the research evaluates how the presence of a greenhouse in a Martian base influences crew well-being, providing insights into the psychological and nutritional benefits of fresh food in isolated environments.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: The microgreens were planted early in the mission (Sol 3), they went through a 5 day phase of germination in the dark and in a humidified environment. We put them under the light during Sol 9 in the GreenHab and in the Science Dome. Everything went according to plan except for the absence of fresh soil in the GreenHab and the fact that the environment is very dry here in the Utah Desert.

AD_4nXfEO-SyZ-w6_LTbeYl-63eirOWjBLqQ-jWjE4z6S19idRh6IVdq68RWMSxVPE4Vlf8LDAlozGrBe1nlN22WQQdFWjTk5GrpZWCaTTXgIplHjNacGTnDIn9UOqUMPRfVoO4VsoTrshKmY_DewHbzHgo?key=jIlEDhEuFQcPRd_cjtrODUUC

Name: TraceLab
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Erin (Crew commander)
Description: This study uses self-administered questionnaires to explore individual and social adaptations to isolated and confined extreme environments. The goal is to examine the social, emotional, occupational, and physical impacts of these conditions, providing insights into human resilience and well-being in space-like settings.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: The crew is filling daily questionnaire about individual and social adaptations. As well, weekly questionnaires about team dynamics are filled out.
Name: Core Data
Type: Physiology
Crew: Robin (Crew Engineer)
Description: The Supaero MDRS Crews Initiative aims to collect physiological datasets for human factors research. In addition to physiological data, the study includes water monitoring and environmental measurements. The purpose is to ensure comprehensive data collection while minimizing redundancy, enhancing the reliability and applicability of the research.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: The crew is taking daily physiological data (Oxymetry, Systolic and diastolic blood, temperature) as well as other parameters using the Withings smart scale. The crew also fills daily sleep dairy every morning before the sport session. Everyone is wearing a Withings smartwatch to collect data all along the day.

Name: MoovToLearn
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist)
Description: This study examines the impact of luminotherapy and relaxation technology on analog astronauts, focusing on factors such as sleep quality. It utilizes Psio glasses to explore their effects while relying solely on Core Data, without conducting cognitive assessments.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: Not started yet.

Name: TwinS2
Type: Human Factors
Crew: Isolde (Crew Journalist)
Description: The objective of this study is to test and improve the TwinS2 system by evaluating human performance through non-invasive methods. Voice messages recorded via a microphone provide data for researchers, allowing them to assess and refine their software.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: The crew takes daily recording where they share how they felt during the day, as well as a weekly recording of 4 hours every Thursday.
Name: AMI
Type: Technology
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist) & Isolde (Crew Journalist)
Description: This study conducts an in-situ test of an anomaly surveillance interface to enhance the simulation. It analyzes crew reactions to unplanned or randomized events that require minor interventions. In some cases, the study may involve up to two "emergency" EVAs near the station. The use of the Engineering Airlock has been requested to support the experiment.
Related EVAs: no EVA
Status: Not started yet.

Name: Exploration – Stratigraphy
Type: Geology
Crew: Quentin (Crew Astronomer) & Meddi (GreenHab Officer)
Description: This experiment, conducted by the Research Institute of Astrophysics and Planetology (IRAP), involves EVAs coordinated with photogrammetry EVAs. It focuses on testing stratigraphy through drone imagery, aiming to identify geological samples using these pictures. The study also seeks to train the drone to capture images of entire stratigraphic layers for improved geological analysis.
Related EVAs: #4 and #8
Status: During the two EVAs conducted last week, Crew members took notes of different strates in different areas around the base. They took different aerial pictures using drones as well as a professional camera. They also did different drawing of the geological area.

AD_4nXe6Yqkci_IABr4ys2kL8oEpzvZ2_BxIq7HaIVmg1Lvruu73TGauaJZEG0qd_KVmBrqycuxt8pG8wD6hD1WnjnS5AcmuEoxjy5DSw-yYRDxFOYRK9eoMcdXCXjBRcetDAMaOSlOX0wHaX8FXlORfsw?key=jIlEDhEuFQcPRd_cjtrODUUC

Name: SupaeroMoon
Type: Robotics
Crew: Somaya (Crew Scientist) & Robin (Crew Engineer)
Description: This project focuses on rovers and technologies designed for the lunar environment, with participation in the European Rover Challenge 2025. It involves testing remote control navigation, evaluating camera and mapping methodologies, and exploring the feasibility of simple autonomous navigation. Additionally, the study tests a robotic arm for probe retrieval and collaborates with high school students on Arduino-based experiments.
Related EVAs:
Status: We printed different parts of the robot using the 3D printer “Bambo Lab A1”. The assembly of the entire rover will be done in the next week.

Name: Public Outreach
Type: Social
Crew: Meddi (GreenHab Officer)
Description: This project aims to teach the scientific method through a hands-on experiment. It involves sprouting cress seeds in highly saline soil to simulate Martian conditions and assess plant growth viability. The experiment requires one EVA for execution.
Related EVAs: Coupled with the preparation of some future EVAs
Status: Microgreens and EVA Preparation, the weekly reports of microgreens activities are being sent to highschoolers from different schools. The students that work with us are very motivated to be in some way part of our MDRS mission. When it comes to EVA Preparation, students will discover what is at stake in EVA Preparation during week 3 and 4 of our stay at the MDRS.

Name: Astronomer’s observation project
Type: Astronomy
Crew: Quentin (Crew astronomer)
Description: Quentin’s observation project consists of two distinct works: during the first two weeks of the mission, he familiarized himself with the telescope of the Musk Observatory by doing several pictures and animations of the Sun with different parameters. By doing so, he managed to capture high-quality pictures and videos of sunspots and prominences and learned to process them using various softwares.
Status: For the two following weeks, he will use these newly acquired skills to conduct his main project: detecting, taking the coordinates and keeping track of sunspots. He fully developed the code to do so and will test it on his previous observations. The final goal of this work is to find a correlation between the behavior of sunspots and the dynamic of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), which pose a great threat for the future of manned space exploration.

Une image contenant objet astronomique, lune, espace, planète Le contenu généré par l’IA peut être incorrect.

Astronomy Report – February 26th

[category  astronomy-report]

Astronomy Report

Name: Quentin Berlemont

Crew: 311

Date: 02/26/2025

MDRS ROBOTIC OBSERVATORY

Robotic Telescope Used (choose one) MDRS-14 MDRS-WF RCOS-16

Objects to be Imaged this Evening:

Images submitted with this report:

Problems Encountered:

MUSK OBSERVATORY

Solar Features Observed: Sunspots, prominences

Images submitted with this report: 0

Problems Encountered: No problems, only solutions! I found the issue in
my observations, now I have the same quality as yours, and have observed
cool prominences. I have not yet had the time to process the images,
I’ll send some tomorrow. I want to make an animation of the sun surface
features and prominences (500 images every 15 seconds for 1 hour), do
you have advice for this? I plan on using Autostakkert!3, IMPPG, NAFE
and Lightroom but if you have other suggestions they are welcome!

Copyright © The Mars Society. All rights reserved. | Main Site